The role of European Union values in the Ukrainian social-humanitarian safety provision system

Abstract views: 83 / PDF downloads: 44




social-humanitarian safety provision system, European values, regional values, democratization, democratic institutions


The article aims to analyze the role of European Union values in providing a social-economic and humanitarian safety provision system in Ukraine. The research methods include descriptive analysis, an interdisciplinary approach integrated into the different analytical fields, and the range of humanitarian safety perspectives they bring to bear on a certain topic, theme, or issue in the political, economic, legal, and social sciences estimate. The checked hypothesis is the social-humanitarian safety provision system depends on the process of democratization of society and the functioning of democratic institutions in Ukraine. The democratization of society created the fundament of the social-humanitarian safety provision system. The democratization process depends on the relationship between European values and regional-specific factors in Ukraine.

The social and humanitarian safety provision system in Ukraine closely interconnected with the degree of economic, political, and social transformation, as well as the overall indicators of the market and democratic reforms. The analysis of reforming institutions in Ukrainian and European Union (EU) values and beliefs adoption and adherence defines the key problem of the social and humanitarian safety provision system. The balance of European and regional values directed to the achievement of an acceptable level of the social-humanitarian safety provision system in Ukraine.

The creation of institutions that ensure the acceptable balance formation of European and regional values is an important task for EU integration. The transformation of social-political values to EU values relates to the process of democratization. Social-humanitarian safety provision system depends on the effectiveness of functioning democratic institutions.


Alyushin, A., L. (1992). The Paternalistic Tradition and Russia’s Transition to Liberal Democracy. In: Democratic Institutions. Published by the Carnegie Council on Ethics and International Affairs and the Center for Research and Communication. N.Y. Vol.1.

An Institutional Approach to the Responsibility to Protect. (2013). Eds. Gentian Zyberi. University Oslo. June.

Ashworth, L., M. (2008). Interdisciplinarity and International Relations. European Consortium for Political Research. URL: doi:10.1057/eps.2008.11

A Valuable Component of Economic Orientations and Behaviors. (2022). Scientific Report. Eds. R.Y. Levin. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine SU “Institute of Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”. URL:

Bicchieri, C., Dimant, E., Gächter, S., Nosenzo, D. (2022). Social proximity and the erosion of norm compliance. Games and Economic Behavior, 132, 59-72. URL:

Borchgrevink, K. (2021). Negotiating Rights and Faith: A Study of Rights-based Approaches to Humanitarian Action in Pakistan. Disasters. 08 March. URL:

Euro-Performing of Ukraine: Values do Matter (2017). Analytical Center “Observatory of Democracy. URL:

Fukuyama, F. (2015). Why is Democracy Performing so Poorly? Journal of Democracy. Volume 26, Number 1 January. National Endowment for Democracy and Johns Hopkins University Press.

Social Screening of Ukrainian Society During the Russian Invasion – the twelfth Wave of the Study.(2022). Analytical Report. Centre for Economic Recovery. Gradus Research Company. URL:›Gradus_EUwave_12_ENG

Kennedy, D. (2016). A World of Struggle: How Power, Law, and Expertise Shape Global Political Economy, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Kozyreva, L., D. (2020). The State and the Citizen: From Paternalism to Neopaternalism. URL: Administrative Consulting: 46-52. No 7. URL: DOI 10.22394/1726-1139-2020-7-46-52

Leith, C. (2011). Humanistic Perspective. In: Goldstein, S., Naglieri, J.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Child Behavior and Development. Springer, Boston, MA. URL:

Metcalfe, V., Martin, E., Pantuliano, S. (2011). Risk in Humanitarian Action: Towards a Common Approach? HPG Commissioned Paper. January. 2022, URL:

Nosova, O. (2022 ). Transformation of the Social-Economic and Political Values in Ukraine to the European Union Values. Bulletin of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Economic Series. No (103), 5-16. 2022, URL:

Nosova, O., Lypov, V. (2022). Cultural Values in the Formation of Economic Relations. London Journal of Social Sciences. Volume: 2, Number: 4: 20-33.

OCHA. Ukraine Crisis Response – Fact Sheet. (2023). 27 July.

Roberts, A. (1999). The Role of Humanitarian Issues in International Politics in the 1990s. International Review of the Red Cross, No. 833.

Rubinski, Y., I. (2013). Main Trends of the European Values. Reports of the Institute of Europe. № 297. M.: Institute of Europe, RAS.

Sivakumaran, S. (2022). International Humanitarian Law. June.

Strelnikov, V. (2022). Ethno-Cultural Component of the Activities of Humanitarian Field Specialists. No.11. URL: DOI

The Security Sector Legislation of Ukraine (2013). Second Edition. Eds: Philipp Fluri, Marcin Koziel, Andrii Yermolaiev. Сenter for Аrmy, Сonversion and Disarmament Studies, Kyiv.

Tugwell, R., G. (1923). Human Nature in Economic Theory. Journal of Political Economy, Jun., Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 317- 345 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable.

Ukraine in World Values Survey. Resume of the Analytical Report. (2020). NGO Ukrainian Centre for European Policy. Kyiv.

Ukrainian Society and European Values. Report on the Results of Sociological Research. (2022). Gorschenin Institute. Friedrich Erbert Stiftung. Kyiv. URL:




How to Cite

Nosova, O. (2023). The role of European Union values in the Ukrainian social-humanitarian safety provision system. London Journal of Social Sciences, (5), 19–32.