The names and email addresses entered in London Journal of Social Sciences will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal. The data collected from registered and non-registered users of this journal falls within the scope of the standard functioning of peer-reviewed journals. It includes information that makes communication possible for the editorial process; it is used to inform readers about the authorship and editing of content and it enables collecting aggregated data on readership behaviors. The data will not be sold by this journal, nor will it be used for purposes other than those stated here. The authors published in this journal are responsible for the human subject data that figures in the research reported here.
Plagiarism is scientific misconduct and is an unacceptable violation of publication ethics. It should be dealt with promptly.
The managing editor and reviewers are the primary means of detecting plagiarism in manuscripts submitted to London Journal of Social Sciences. If reviewers suspect misconduct, they should notify the Managing Editor.
Ethical standards for publication exist to ensure high-quality scientific publications, public trust in scientific findings, and that people receive credit for their ideas. Papers submitted to London Journal of Social Sciences are subject to rigorous peer review to ensure that the research published is 'good science'.
London Journal of Social Sciences has a 'double blind' review process: Authors are not told who reviewed their paper. The peer referees’ identity remains unknown to the authors throughout the review process.
ISSN 2754-7671 (online)