How Fair is Education Policy in Albania?

Albana  Cekrezi

doi:10.31039/ljss.2021.1.42

Authors

Albana Cekrezi Epoka University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31039/ljss.2021.1.42

Keywords:

democracy, education, fairness, education policy

Abstract

Democracy, although a highly debated concept, preserves its identity in the values upon which it is founded. These values give universality to democracy, are normative and define democracy. Fairness is considered as one of the standard values of democracy. It is seen as justice, social justice and as equality. Fairness is highly discussed from the prospect of distributive justice. As injustice comes from unfair distribution of resources, the criteria over which this distribution is done is important. Three are the main principles based on which fair distribution is conducted: equality; everyone receives the same resource; equity, resource is distributed based on merit, work, talent; need, resource is distributed based on what individuals need. The development of political culture is the bridge that links fairness with citizens. Education stands as an important tool that influences political culture. At the same time, it is one of the spheres where to notice issues of fairness. In education, a top-down analysis of fairness necessitates the examination of education policy. The driving research question has been to examine how education policy in Albania reflects issues of fairness. It brings results from the analysis of formal documents representing education policy. Content analysis has been used as a method aiming to filter these documents for issues related to fairness.

References

Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1989). The Civic Culture-Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Aristotle, & Jowett, B. (1999). Politics. Kitchener: Ont: Batoche Books.

Balot, R., & Trochimchuk, S. (2012). The Many and the Few: On Machiavelli's "Democratic Moment". The Review of Politics, 74(4), 559-588.

Bentley, D. J. (1973). A Theory of Justice. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 121(5), 1070-1078.

Cardno, C. (2018). Policy Document Analysis: A Practical Educational Leadership Tool and a Qualitative Research Method. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 24(4), 623-640.

Council of Europe. (2018, April). Reference Framework of Competences for Democratic Culture. Retrieved from Council of Europe: https://www.coe.int/en/web/campaign-free-to-speak-safe-to-learn/reference-framework-of-competences-for-democratic-culture

Cutright, P. (1963). National Political Development: Measurement and Analysis. American Sociological Review, 28(2), 253-264.

DeBell, M. (2013). Harder Than It Looks: Coding Political Knowledge on the ANES. Political Analysis, 21(4), 393-406. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/24572671

Duch, R. M., & Gibson, J. L. (1992). "Putting Up With" Fascists in Western Europe: A Comparative, Cross-Level Analysis of Political Tolerance. The Western Political Quarterly, 45(1), 237-273.

Eurydice. (2019, 28 March). Legislation and Official Policy Documents-Albania. Retrieved from Eurydice: https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/legislation_en

Hahn, C. L. (1999). Citizenship Education: An Empirical Study of Policy, Practices and Outcomes. Oxford Review of Education, 25(1/2), 231-250.

Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy. Cambridge and Malden: Polity Press.

Hoskins, B., Villalba, E., & Van Nijlen, D. (2008). Measuring Civic Competence in Europe-A Composite Indicator based on IEA Civic Education Study. Luxembourg: Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen, Centre for Research on Lifelong Learning (CRELL).

https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home. (2020, March). Retrieved from https://www.qsrinternational.com: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home

IZHA. (2010). Curricular Frame-Social Sciences. Retrieved from ascap.edu.al: https://ascap.edu.al/Biblioteka/6Udhezues%20te%20Pergjithshem/Shkencat-Shoqerore-Shkenca-Shoqerore.pdf

Jasso, G., Törnblom, K. Y., & Sabbagh, C. (2016). Distributive Justice. In C. Sabbagh, & M. Schmitt, Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research (pp. 201-218). New York, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London: Springer.

Klees, S. J., & Strike, K. A. (1976). Justice as Fairness: Coleman's Review Essay on Rawls. American Journal of Sociology, 82(1), 193-201.

Konow, J., & Schwettmann, L. (2016). The Economics of Justice. In C. Sabbagh, & M. Schmitt, Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research (pp. 83-106). New York, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London: Springer.

Kracauer, S. (1952-1953). The Challenge of Qualitative Content Analysis. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 16(4), 631-642.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis-An Introduction to its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Kurki, M. (2010). Democracy and Conceptual Contestability: Reconsidering Conceptions of Democracy in Democracy Promotion. International Studies Review, 12(3), 362-386.

Kuyper, J. (2016). Global Democracy-The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford : Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

Lucci, D. (2018). Political Scepticism, Moral Scepticism, and the Scope and Limits of Toleration in John Locke. In Yearbook of the Maimonides Centre for Advanced Studies (pp. 109-143). De Gruyter.

Mandle, J. (1999). The Reasonable in Justice as Fairness. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 29(1), 75-107.

Miller, D. (1992). Distributive Justice: What the People Think. Ethics, 102(3), 555-593.

Munck, G. L. (2014). What is Democracy? A Reconceptualization of the Quality of Democracy. Democratization, 23(1), 1-26.

On Pre-University Education System in the Republic of Albania. (2012). Law nr.69/2012 On Pre-University Education System in the Republic of Albania. Tirana, Albania.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone-The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Rawls, J. (1971, 1999). A Theory of Justice- Revised Edition. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Reidy, D. A. (2010). Rawls's Religion and Justice as Fairness. History of Political Thought, 31(2), 309-343.

Resh, N., & Sabbagh, C. (2016). Justice and Education. In C. Sabbagh, & M. Schmitt, Handbook of Social Justice Theory and Research (pp. 349-367). New York, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London: Springer.

Selznick, G. J., & Steinberg, S. (1969). The Tenacity of Prejudice: Anti-semitism in Contemporary America. New York: Harper and Row.

Sodaro, M. J. (2004). Comparative Politics-A Global Intruduction-Second Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Taylor, S., Rivzi, F., Lingard, B., & Miriam, H. (1997). Educational Policy and the Politics of Change. London and New York: Routledge.

Ten, C. L. (1969). Mill and Liberty. Journal of the History of Ideas, 30(1), 47-68.

The Curricula Framework of the Pre-University Education of the Republic of Albania. (2014). Retrieved from https://ascap.edu.al/: https://ascap.edu.al/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Korniza-Kurrikulare.pdf

Tierney, B. (2014). Marsilius of Padua. In B. Tierney, Liberty and Law (pp. 122-141). Washington, D.C: Catholic University of America Press.

UNESCO. (2013). UNESCO Handbook on Education Policy Analysis and Programming-Education Policy Analysis. Bankok: UNESCO.

UNESCO; IZHA. (2017). Albania-The Analysis of Education Policy-Issues and Recommendation. Paris: UNESCO.

Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action . (1993, June 25). Retrieved from OHCHR: https://www.ohchr.org/Documents/ProfessionalInterest/vienna.pdf

Wade, I. O. (1976). Rousseau and Democracy. The French Review, 49(6), 926-937.

Wenar, L. (2008, 2017, January 9). John Rawls. In E. N. Zalta, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, California, U.S.A: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved from Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rawls/#TwoGuiIdeJusFai

White, M. D., & Marsh, E. (2006). Content Analysis: A Flexible Methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22–45.

White, P. (1999). Political Education in the Early Years: The Place of Civic Virtues. Oxford Review of Education, 25(1/2), 59-70.