Sociovirtualization and Cultural Identity Formation in the Digital Age
Abstract views: 90
/ 
PDF downloads: 46
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31039/plic.2024.11.249Keywords:
Sociovirtualization, cultural identity, digital age, virtual communities, digital literacy, cross-cultural dialogueAbstract
The way that cultural identities are created and represented in the digital era has been significantly influenced by the phenomena of sociovirtualization, or the blending of the online and offline spheres. The possibilities and difficulties that sociovirtualization brings for the creation and negotiation of cultural identities are critically examined in this paper. It investigates the ways in which virtual environments support the development of diasporic communities, the curation of multifaceted cultural identities, and the promotion of intercultural communication. However, dangers including preconceptions, cultural appropriation, and systematic bias reinforcement are also addressed. In order to maximize sociovirtualization's transformational potential while preserving genuine cultural expressions, the essay promotes digital literacy, ethical technology use, and inclusive virtual settings. Scholars and practitioners may ensure that varied narratives are amplified and celebrated by navigating the challenges of cultural identity creation in digital domains through a comprehensive knowledge of this phenomena.
References
Bassett, D. J. (2015). Who Wants to Live Forever? Living, Dying and Grieving in Our Digital Society. Social Sciences 4, no. 4: 1127-1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci4041127
Buckley, K. (2008). The Truth Is in the Red Files: An Overview of Archives in Popular Culture. Archivaria 66 (1), 95-123. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13187
Bunker, C. J. & Kwan, V. S.Y. (2023). Deviation from Design: A Meta-Analytic Review on the Link Between Social Media Use and Less Connection Between the Self and Others. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 26:11, 805-822 https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2022.037
Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society. Wiley-Blackwell.
Chouinard, J. A. (2010). Understanding Cross-Cultural Evaluation: Making Sense of Theory and Practice. Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 72-08, Section: A, page: 2745. http://dx.doi.org/10.20381/ruor-13280
Christian, A. J., Day, F., Díaz, M., & Peterson-Salahuddin, C. (2020). Platforming Intersectionality: Networked Solidarity and the Limits of Corporate Social Media. Social Media + Society, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120933301
Dorothy, K. TreaAndrea, M. R., Corrigan, V., Cassius, A., Veronica, P., T. L. Cowan, Everett, A. & Latorre, G. (2018). Race, Gender, and the Technological Turn: A Roundtable on Digitizing Revolution. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 39(1), 149–177. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5250/fronjwomestud.39.1.0149
Dressel, M. (2014). The Digital "I": The Spirit and Form of the Blog and the Serialization of the Self. Cuny Academic Works: Published 2014, Sociology
Ginsberg, R. & Glenn, W. (2019). Engaging with Multicultural YA Literature in the Secondary Classroom: Critical Approaches for Critical Educators. Routledge: pp.220
Hall, S. (1993). Culture, community, nation. Cultural Studies, 7(3), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502389300490251
Hollenbaugh, E. E. (2021). Self-Presentation in social media: Review and research opportunities. Review of Communication Research, 9, 80-98. https://doi.org/10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.027
Hong Q.N., Gonzalez-Reyes A., Pluye, P. (2018). Improving the usefulness of a tool for appraising the quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies, the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). J Eval Clin Pract.; 24: 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12884
Jacobs, G., Caraça, J., Fiorini, R., Erich Hoedl, E., Nagan, W. P., Reuter, T., Zucconi, A. (2008). The Future of Democracy: Challenges & Prospects. CADMUS, Volume 3/Issue 4, p. 1-25.
Kim, Y. (2017). Cross-Cultural Adaptation. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Retrieved 5 Jul. 2024, from https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-21
Kurt, I. (2023a). The Agents of Socialization Keep in Touch with Socio-Virtualization. London Journal of Social Sciences, (5), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31039/ljss.2023.5.90
Kurt, I. (2023b). Covid-19 and sociovirtualization: Exploring new ways to socialize. London Journal of Social Sciences, (7), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.31039/ljss.2024.7.186
Kurt, I. (2023c). Comprehensive review on Parenting and Technology: Opportunities and Challenges in the 21st Century. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 10(2), 1-14. Retrieved from https://revistia.com/index.php/ejser/article/view/6970
Kurt, I. (2024a). Exploring the Journey of Sociovirtualization: Understanding the Process of Socialization in a Virtual Context. London Journal of Interdisciplinary Sciences, (2), 38–51. Retrieved from https://londonic.uk/js/index.php/jis/article/view/225
Kurt, I. (2024b). The Role of Socialization Agents in Sociovirtualization: Bridging the Gap between Virtual and Real-world Interactions. London Journal of Social Sciences, (8), 8-21. https://doi.org/10.31039/ljss.2024.8.197
Kurt, İ. (2012). Toplumsallaşma Sürecinin ‘Toplumsanallaşma’ Bağlamindaki Yolculuğu. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7 (1), 1-10. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/befdergi/issue/23151/247282
Ponzanesi, S. (2020). Digital Diasporas: Postcoloniality, Media and Affect. Interventions, 22(8), 977–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2020.1718537
Popay, J. et al. (2006). Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews. A Product from the ESRC Methods Programme. Accessed: 06/06/2024 https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=ed8b23836338f6fdea0cc55e161b0fc5805f9e27
Rosenfeld, K.N. (2015). Virtualization and Digital Online Culture. In: Digital Online Culture, Identity, and Schooling in the Twenty-First Century. New Frontiers in Education, Culture, and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137442604_1
Shucksmith, M. (2012). Class, Power and Inequality in Rural Areas: Beyond Social Exclusion? Sociologia Ruralis, 52: 377-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2012.00570.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ibrahim Kurt
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives-No additional restrictions.
Authors retain copyright and agree to license their articles with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-
