The Frictionless Fallacy in Sociovirtualization: Assessing the Impact of Artificial Intimacy on Adolescent Psychosocial Development
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31039/plic.2026.17.407Keywords:
AI companionship, Adolescents, Interpersonal relationships, Social connectedness, Emotion-well-being, Psychosocial development, Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)Abstract
Artificial Intelligence Companions (AI-Cs) are a specialized class of conversationally based chatbots driven by extremely advanced generative AI systems, which are fine-tuned to simulate human personality and emotional intelligence and to present the user with interpersonal warmth. Unlike the traditional utility-based AI platforms designed for informational tasks, AI-Cs are engineered to establish long-term relational connections and express continuous, simulated empathy. Psychologically, they function as objects of anthropomorphism, allowing users to project real human qualities onto an interface because the software can mirror subtle real-world social interactional cues. This topic is of utmost significance today because society has entered an era of “sociovirtualization”, a paradox where young individuals are more digitally connected than ever before, yet report record-high levels of deep loneliness. Because these platforms are often commercially optimized to maximize user engagement, they capitalize directly on the attachment vulnerabilities of developing adolescents during a vital period of prefrontal cortex maturation. Extensive interactions with a perfectly compliant, algorithmically enhanced chatbot induce maladaptive relational learning, conditioning youth to expect real human interactions to be completely frictionless. When these individuals return to real-world peer ecosystems, their eroded frustration tolerance accelerates the dangerous cycle of social withdrawal and overall human displacement.
The paper explores how frequent interaction with AI companions relates to interpersonal relationships, social connectedness, and emotional well-being among adolescents. Specifically, it investigates the association between sustained use of conversational AI systems and adolescents' broader psychosocial development, including patterns of social interaction, the quality of interpersonal relationships, and emotional functioning. Rather than focusing on a single method of emotional disclosure, this paper examines AI companionship as an ongoing form of social engagement. It explores how prolonged interaction with AI companions relates to adolescents' psychosocial development. Adopting a systematic literature review approach, this paper effectively consolidates empirical data and foundational findings from over 15 peer-reviewed studies. To investigate the identified psychological dynamics, this study synthesizes information from prominent databases specializing in human-computer interactions, media psychology, and behavioral neuroscience. The structural framework implemented comprehensively tracks a plethora of datasets regarding AI companionship, parasocial relations, digital communication, loneliness, adolescent behavior, and youth mental health. As AI companion platforms become increasingly integrated into everyday lives, it is crucial that the scientific community deeply evaluates the connection they have with adolescent development. Effectively mapping this phenomenon directly supports clinical and educationally-based prevention methods by identifying the specific tipping point at which automated comfort transforms into structural social displacement. Ultimately, clarifying these systematic mechanisms can act to further empower young adults, parents, educators, and mental health professionals to better recognize the distinct benefits, hidden risks, and overall long-term limitations of artificial intimacy.
References
Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
Common Sense Media. (2025). The presence of virtual intimacy: AI companions and adolescent well-being. Common Sense Media Research Publications.
De Freitas, J., Erdinç, B., Gross, J. J., & Hancock, J. T. (2026). AI companions and adolescent social relationships. PMC Behavioral Sciences, 41(2), 112–126. nih.gov
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton & Company.
Folk, D., Heine, S. J., & Dunn, E. (2025). Individual differences in anthropomorphism help explain social connection to AI companions. Scientific Reports, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19212-2
Gleason, T. R., Theran, S. A., & Newberg, E. M. (2017). Parasocial interactions and relationships in early adolescence. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(255). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00255
Herbener, A. B., & Damholdt, M. F. (2024). Are lonely youngsters turning to chatbots for companionship? The relationship between chatbot usage and social connectedness in Danish high-school students. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 196, Article 103409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103409
Kurt, I. (2026). The sociovirtualization paradox: Being highly connected but still lonely in the digital age. Proceedings of the London International Conference, 16(3), 374.
Maples, B., Cerit, M., Vishwanath, A., & Hancock, J. T. (2024). Loneliness and suicide mitigation for students using GPT-3-enabled chatbots. npj Mental Health Research, 3(1), 45–58. nih.gov
Meeus, W. (2016). Adolescent psychosocial development: A review of longitudinal models and research. Developmental Psychology, 52(12), 1969–1993. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000243
Merrill, K., Mikkilineni, S. D., & Dehnert, M. (2025). Artificial intelligence chatbots as a source of virtual social support: Implications for loneliness and anxiety management. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1549(1), 148–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15400
Nass, C., & Reeves, B. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press.
Ng, P. M. L., Wan, C., Lee, D., Garnelo-Gomez, I., & Lau, M. M. (2025). I love you, my AI companion! Do you? Perspectives from the Triangular Theory of Love and Attachment Theory. Internet Research, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-11-2024-1783
Stanford University. (2025, August 27). Why AI companions and young people can make for a risky mix. Stanford News Service. stanford.edu
Sun, X., Wang, Y., & McDaniel, B. T. (2026). AI companions and adolescent social relationships: Benefits, risks, and bidirectional influences. Child Development Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdpers/aadaf009
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Pervasive technologies: A communication-stimulation model of online social relationships. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(6), 843–848.
Xie, T., & Pentina, I. (2022). Understanding user attachment to AI chatbots: An empirical study of Replika. Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 4122–4131.
Young, M. E., & Vasan, S. (2026). Loneliness and generative AI use for companionship among U.S. college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 168, Article 108392.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ayse Koc, David Hyde, Emine Yildirim

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives-No additional restrictions.
Authors retain copyright and agree to license their articles with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-