Artificial Intelligence in Different Industries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31039/plic.2026.17.398Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Productivity, EmploymentAbstract
Artificial intelligence is quickly becoming one of the most powerful technologies of our generation. But how is AI changing productivity, and will it cause a jobless future? In this study, we analyze how artificial intelligence technology currently in development impacts 5 categories: technology, finance, economics, education, and medicine. Our central research question was answered through surveys of students, working adults, and medical professionals, analysis of peer-reviewed academic studies, and an original experiment: Allow an AI agent to trade real money on the stock market without intervention. In all fields we researched, AI had a significant net positive impact on productivity and efficiency. Respondents across the board reported that AI saves them time, gives them better information, and allows them to do their jobs in education, business, and medicine better. However, nearly all of the financial gains are enjoyed by tech companies and shareholders. And while jobs have not been lost to AI development yet, the majority of employees we surveyed expect negative job impacts in the next ten years. This mirrors academic speculation that nearly half of all jobs have the potential to be automated. Our live-trading experiment with an AI agent showed that AI has both potential and limitations. The bot had a reasonable strategy that made logical decisions, but also lost 12.4% of its money in one week without anyone monitoring it. Ultimately, we found that AI does affect productivity as developed today, but it’s up to policymakers and leaders to prevent AI from hurting society
References
Acemoglu, D., & Johnson, S. (2023). Power and progress: Our thousand-year struggle over technology and prosperity. PublicAffairs.
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2019). Automation and new tasks: How technology displaces and reinstates labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(2), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.2.3
Acemoglu, D., & Restrepo, P. (2024). A task-based approach to inequality. Oxford Open Economics, 3. https://academic.oup.com/ooec/article/3/Supplement_1/i906/7708121
Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.29.3.3
Briggs, J., & Kodnani, D. (2023). The potentially large effects of artificial intelligence on economic growth. Goldman Sachs Global Economics Research. https://archive.org/details/the-potentially-large-effects-of-ai-goldman-sachs
Brynjolfsson, E., Li, D., & Raymond, L. (2025). Generative AI at work. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 140(2), 889–942. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjae044
Civelek, I. (2026). Artificial intelligence and its impact on productivity and employment [Unpublished survey]. Google Forms.
European Parliament. (n.d.). Artificial intelligence: Opportunities and risks. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20200827STO85804/artificial-intelligence-opportunities-and-risks
Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.019
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. (n.d.). AI, education, and career readiness. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/artificial-intelligence/articles/10.3389/frai.2024.1457299/full
Harvard Business Review. (n.d.). Artificial intelligence. https://hbr.org/topic/artificial-intelligence
IBM. (n.d.). What is artificial intelligence? https://www.ibm.com/topics/artificial-intelligence
McKinsey & Company. (n.d.). The economic potential of generative AI: The next productivity frontier. https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-economic-potential-of-generative-ai-the-next-productivity-frontier
MDPI. (n.d.). Generative AI and academic integrity: A systematic literature review. https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/16/4/296
Microsoft. (n.d.). AI. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/ai
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0). https://www.nist.gov/itl/ai-risk-management-framework
Noy, S., & Zhang, W. (2023). Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science, 381(6654). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586
OECD. (n.d.). AI and skills. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/ai-and-skills_f843b352-en.html
OECD. (2026). OECD digital education outlook 2026: Exploring effective uses of generative AI in education. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/oecd-digital-education-outlook-2026_062a7394-en.html
Springer. (n.d.). Generative AI in higher education: Current practices and ways forward. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6
Stanford University. (n.d.). AI index report. Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence. https://aiindex.stanford.edu/report/
Tutor CoPilot. (n.d.). A human-AI approach for scaling real-time expertise. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03017
World Economic Forum. (2023). The future of jobs report 2023. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2023/
World Economic Forum. (2025). The future of jobs report 2025. https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-jobs-report-2025/
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Arda Baki, Esad Celebi, Ihsan Civelek, Halit Altuntas, Esad Boztas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives-No additional restrictions.
Authors retain copyright and agree to license their articles with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-