AI Chatbots in Mental Health Support: Are They Effective


DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31039/plic.2025.14.337Keywords:
Mental health, AI chatbots, Emotional support, Cognitive behavioral therapy, Accessibility, User experience, Ethical concerns, Clinical evaluationAbstract
The increasing global demand for mental health services has highlighted many shortcomings in access, affordability, and timeliness of care. In response, new applications powered by artificial intelligence (AI) in the form of chatbots have been developed to provide increased, scalable access to emotional support, cognitive behavioral techniques, and self-help resources. In this paper, we review the potential for the use of AI chatbots in mental health support and interventions through a focused analysis of applications, clinical evaluations, and user impressions.
Moreover, key examples of applications, for example, Woebot, Wysa, and Youper, yielded some promising results for individuals who experience symptoms of anxiety and/or depression, especially individuals seeking low-barrier, less stigmatizing access to support. Several studies also found benefits in mood charting, facilitating emotional expression, and self-reflection. However, operational usability of AI applications often depends on design efficacy, adherence to evidence-informed therapeutic models, and active user participation.
Indeed, while chatbots are cost-effective and scalable, there are some limitations. Examples of limitations include limited efficacy for some emotional crises that more complex, personalized interventions may deem necessary, insufficient personalization, and lack of true empathy. Additionally, clinical implications cannot progress without further addressing ethical concerns regarding data privacy, informed consent from users, and algorithmic bias in AI responses.
While AI chatbots are not substitutes for licensed mental health professionals, they represent a growing complement in the continuum of care. This paper concludes by emphasizing the need for hybrid human-AI models and stronger regulatory oversight to ensure responsible, safe, and effective deployment.
References
Farzan, M. A. (2025). Artificial intelligence–powered cognitive behavioral therapy chatbots: A systematic review. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry, 20(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v20i1.17395
Feng, Y., Li, P., & Zhao, H. (2025). Effectiveness of AI conversational agents in supporting young people’s mental health: A meta-analysis. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 13(1), e56742. https://doi.org/10.2196/56742
Kuhlmeier, S., Tan, J., & Weiss, A. (2025). Evaluating LLM-based mental health chatbots with simulated users and therapist-led benchmarks. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 014562. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.014562
Li, J., Theng, Y. L., & Foo, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence–based conversational agents for mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. npj Digital Medicine, 6(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-023-00979-5
Mehta, S., Clarke, M., & Parekh, R. (2021). Acceptability and effectiveness of Youper, an AI-powered CBT chatbot, in reducing anxiety and depression symptoms. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(6), e26771. https://doi.org/10.2196/26771
Oghlan, S. (2023). Ethical issues with using AI chatbots in mental health. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 32(4), 456–468. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10291862/
Răsepar Meadi, A. (2025). Exploring the ethical challenges of conversational AI in mental health. JMIR AI, 4(2), e58123. https://doi.org/10.2196/58123
Rządeczka, M., Nowak, K., & Zieliński, T. (2025). Comparing therapeutic chatbots and general-purpose LLMs in cognitive bias correction. JMIR Mental Health, 12(1), e64396. https://doi.org/10.2196/64396
Steenstra, J., & Bickmore, T. (2025). A taxonomy of risks in AI psychotherapy chatbots. Patient Education and Counseling, 119(5), 1012–1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2025.02.004
Zhong, B. (2024). Effectiveness of AI-based chatbot interventions for depression and anxiety: Meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 354, 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.02.015
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Omar Mohammed, Usame Alan, Babatunde Banjoko

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives-No additional restrictions.
Authors retain copyright and agree to license their articles with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-