Manipulativity as an object of transdisciplinary humanities knowledge


Abstract views: 45 / PDF downloads: 54

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31039/plic.2023.8.176

Keywords:

manipulativeness, transdisciplinarity, hidden nature of influence, manipulator, manipulated, manipulative strategies

Abstract

This scientific article presents a content analysis of modern research in the field of manipulation as one of the current topics of the humanitarian scientific paradigm. Manipulativeness as a multifaceted phenomenon attracts the attention of researchers from various disciplines, from psychology and sociology to political science, media communication and linguistics. The aim of the article is to bring together different approaches and research into a single transdisciplinary body of knowledge on manipulation.

The authors analyze different aspects of manipulability, including psychological, socio-cultural and linguistic aspects, especially using the example of media discourse, where manipulation is a key element in politics and media in the modern information age.

The focus is on the influence of media manipulation on public opinion, mood, beliefs and values. The article discusses manipulative strategies, tactics and linguistic means of implementing them in media discourse.

This article also emphasizes the importance of educating and developing critical thinking as a means to counter manipulative strategies and the relevance of studying manipulativeness in the humanities. The authors believe that a general transdisciplinary study will contribute to a deeper understanding of manipulative behavior and help to develop strategies to effectively counter this phenomenon in modern society.

Author Biographies

M.T. Shakenova

Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Philological Sciences Associate Professor of the Department of Russian Language and Literature

G. Zh. Khussainova

Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Phd doctoral student

S. E. Kaldygozova

Auezov South Kazakhstan University, Сandidate of pedagogical sciences Head of the Department of Russian Language and Literature

References

Bykova, O.N. Language manipulation: materials for the encyclopedic dictionary "Culture of Russian Speech" // Theoretical and applied aspects of speech communication: Vestn. Ross. rhetorical Associations. – Krasnoyarsk, 1999. – Issue. 18). – pp. 91–103.

Dijk, T. A. van. Discourse and manipulation/ T.A. van Dijk // Discourse and Society, 2006. No. 17 (2), P. 359-383.

Dotsenko, E.L. Psychology of manipulation: phenomena, mechanisms and protection / E.L. Dotsenko. – M.: Moscow State University Publishing House, 1997. – 344 p.

Egelhofer, J. L., Lecheler, S. 2019. Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: a framework and research agenda, Annals of the International Communication Association, 43 (2), 112-116.

Freelon, D., Wells, C. 2020. Disinformation as political communication, Political Communication, 37, 145-151.

Gornostaeva, Yu.A. Verbal markers of manipulation in English-language polarized political discourse: experience of parameterization and automatic processing: dissertation ... Ph.D. philol.n.: 02.10.19. – Krasnoyarsk, 2018. – 191 p.

Kazakov, A.A. Manipulative potential of a polarized political media text: measurement option // Vestn. Moscow un-ta. Ser. 10. Journalism. – 2018. – No. 6, https://vestnik.journ.msu.ru/upload/iblock/706/vest-06-18_sverka-75-93.pdf

Kopnina G.A. Speech manipulation [Electronic resource]: textbook. allowance / G.A. Kopnin – 4th ed., revised. – M.: Flinta, 2012. – 170 p.

L. de Saussure, Manipulation and Cognitive Pragmatics: Preliminary Hypotheses. / Louis de Saussure // Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind / L. de Saussure, P. Schulz. – Amsterdam – Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2005, p.117.

Maillat, D. Constraining context selection: On the pragmatic inevitability of manipulation // Journal of Pragmatics. – 2013. – No. 59. – P. 190-199.

Martel, C., Pennycook, G., Rand, D. G. 2020. Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5 (1), 47-52.

McLuhan, M. Understanding Media: External Extensions of Man. Per. from English V. Nikolaeva; Closing Art. M. Vavilova. Moscow; Zhukovsky: “KANON-press-C”, “Kuchkovo Pole”, 2003, 464 p.

Shakenova, M.T., Tashimkhanova, D.S., Popovich, O.A. The concept of “manipulativeness” in modern discourse // Bulletin of Toraigyrov University. Series "Philological Sciences". – 2020. – No. 4. – P.337-350.

Sternin, I. A. Fundamentals of speech influence. – Voronezh, 2012. – P. 56

Vasilenko, T.S., Belova, E.V., Shevarshinova E.I. The role of language means in exerting a manipulative impact on the audience (on the example of BBC radio text) // World of Science. Series: Sociology, Philology, Cultural Studies. – 2019. – 1(10).

Downloads

Published

2023-12-21

How to Cite

Shakenova, M., Khussainova, G. Z., & Kaldygozova , S. E. (2023). Manipulativity as an object of transdisciplinary humanities knowledge. Proceedings of London International Conferences, (8), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.31039/plic.2023.8.176

Issue

No. 8 (2023): Proceedings of London International Conferences

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 M.T. Shakenova, G. Zh. Khussainova, S. E. Kaldygozova

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms. Under the following terms: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives-No additional restrictions.

Authors retain copyright and agree to license their articles with a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.